As clinicians, we’re always looking for ways to optimize the quality of care we provide while managing the practical realities of service delivery.
ABA software is often viewed as a tool to increase efficiency or cut administrative costs—but its impact on clinical accuracy and data integrity is often overlooked. A case study from a Portia user illustrates this point in compelling detail.
Background: 17 Weeks of Paper-Based Data Collection
The case involved a learner receiving 40 hours per week of intensive ABA therapy.
For the first 17 weeks of treatment, the clinical team relied exclusively on paper-based data collection methods. After this period, Portia Software was introduced to streamline data workflows and improve treatment fidelity.
A Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) later audited the paper data and identified a total of 302 human errors during the initial 17-week period, which were categorized as follows:
- 59 Life Cycle Errors
These included either failing to advance targets appropriately (e.g., from acquisition to generalization) or progressing them prematurely, before the required mastery criteria had been met. - 47 Skill Tracker Errors
Errors in logging correct responses or incorrectly recording performance data, impacting session-level accuracy. - 102 Cumulative Tracker Errors
Mistakes in aggregating data across sessions, compromising longitudinal treatment insights and decision-making. - 72 Graphing Errors
Errors in hand-drawn graphs, including mislabeling, data point omissions, and visual misrepresentations of progress trends.
These errors, while individually manageable, cumulatively posed a significant risk to treatment integrity and clinical decision-making.
Post-Implementation: A Zero-Error Outcome
Once Portia Software was implemented, the results were dramatic: zero human data-entry errors were recorded across the same measures.
By automating critical components of data collection—such as skill tracking, lifecycle progression, cumulative metrics, and graph generation—Portia effectively removed the most error-prone aspects of the clinical workflow.
Why This Matters for Clinicians
Human error in data collection is not simply a clerical issue—it has direct consequences for treatment accuracy, patient outcomes, and ethical compliance.
Inaccurate data can lead to faulty clinical decisions, delay skill acquisition, or even compromise the learner’s progress.
Tools like Portia are designed with the clinician in mind. They don’t just save time—they uphold the standards of clinical excellence we strive for by:
- Ensuring consistency across sessions and providers
- Supporting timely and accurate treatment decisions
- Simplifying compliance with documentation and reporting requirements
- Allowing BCBAs to focus more on analysis and supervision rather than administrative review
Final Thoughts
In a field where data drives treatment and outcomes, reducing human error is not optional—it’s essential.
Portia Software offers clinicians a way to maintain fidelity, accuracy, and accountability at every level of care. This case study makes it clear: technology isn’t just a support tool, it’s a clinical asset.
Start Your Free Trial Today
Better experience for your customers, fewer headaches for your team. You'll be set up in minutes.